Background
At 4:36 P.M. EST, a Tesla Model S 70D car traveling eastbound of US
Highway 27A (US-27A) near mile marker 29 in Levy County, west of
Williston, Florida, struck the right side of a Utility 3000R
refrigerated semitrailer, which was being towed by a Freightliner
Cascadia truck-tractor. At the time of the collision, the truck was
making a left turn from westbound US-27A across the two eastbound travel
lanes onto NE 140th Court, a local paved road. After initial impact,
the Tesla passed underneath the semitrailer, shearing off the car’s
roof. The Tesla continued off the right side of the road at a shallow
angle, through a drainage culvert and two wire fences. It then struck
and broke a utility pole, rotated counterclockwise and came to rest
perpendicular to the highway in the front yard of a private residence.
Overall, the Tesla traveled about 910 feet after striking the
semitrailer. The driver, who was the sole occupant died in the crash.[1]
Introtech Accident Reconstruction Services
James Crawford
of Introtech was retained to perform an accident reconstruction on
behalf of the driver’s family. Mr. Crawford, who is an accredited
accident reconstructionist and holds a B.S. in electrical engineering
and M.S. in Aeronautical Engineering, provided an analysis of the
Tesla’s sensors with their capabilities and limitations. Mr. Crawford
analyzed the event data from the Tesla’s Autopilot suite which was in
operation at the time of the crash.
"Autopilot" is a proprietary
name used by Tesla for a combination of vehicle automation systems that
provide driver assistance. The car is also equipped with a forward
collision warning (FCW) system and automatic emergency braking (AEB),
but those systems did not activate.
Mr. Crawford personally
inspected the Tesla and the semitrailer that it struck. He documented
damage on both vehicles with forensic measurements, notes and digital
images and video.
Using data from Mr.
Crawford’s research and inspections along with measurements taken by the
Florida Highway Patrol, Mr. Crawford prepared a scale drawing of the
crash scene. He used the scale drawing along with the data from the
Tesla’s Autopilot system and the Freightliner’s Engine Control Module
(ECM) to as key inputs to his reconstruction of this crash.
Analysis
System performance data
indicated that the vehicle speed just before impact with the semitrailer
was 74 mph. The highway has a posted speed limit of 65 mph. Driving at a
speed of 9 mph over the posted speed limit, while improper, was not
automatically unreasonable for the conditions that existed at the time
of this crash. The NTSB ultimately came to the same conclusions as the
Introtech reconstruction:
- There was sufficient
sight distance to afford time for either the truck driver or the car
driver to have acted to prevent this crash.
- This version of Tesla’s
automated vehicle control system was not designed to, and did not,
identify the truck crossing the car’s path or recognize the impending
crash. Therefore, the Autopilot system did not reduce the car’s
velocity, the forward collision warning system did not provide an alert,
and the automatic emergency braking did not activate.
- The cause of this
accident was the truck driver’s failure to yield the right of way to the
Tesla, combined with the Tesla driver’s lack of reaction to the
presence of the truck, likely because of an overreliance on the Tesla’s
automation systems.
To learn more about Introtech accident reconstruction process, read our car accident reconstruction page.